SURVIVING THE PEACE
The Struggle for Postwar Recovery in Bosnia-Herzegovina
home ♦ about the blog ♦ the book ♦ the author ♦ buy the book ♦ contact
June 19, 2022
Bosnia update: "Nothing happens in Bosnia"; Funding the elections; Bosnia and
Croatia; Happenings in Prijedor; Fascism on May 9th.
During the last month or so, Bosnia-Herzegovina has seen a continuation of a
variety of simmering problems, with one or two solutions, but no real progress.
A friend said to me the other day, "Nothing happens in Bosnia." This sounds odd
given that, when observing the country day to day at the granular level, it
seems that things are always about to explode. Thinking back to last fall, there
were ongoing, dire predictions of war. As I wrote then, you can never rule out
war. But war did not break out this spring, when it could have, and it
doesn't look likely at this point.
There again, during the now waning season there have been predictions of a
boycott of the upcoming elections, with many people convinced they would not
take place. That outcome has now been circumvented.
And the ongoing move toward secession of the Serb-controlled entity has stalled,
for the moment, notwithstanding statements that the secession is already
underway.
All of this, and other similar developments, lead me to agree with my friend
that, at the very least, there's a lot more drama in Bosnia than actual history
taking place. You could confirm this by looking at any Bosnian newspaper, where
80% to 90% of the articles are about what one politician said about another
politician. That's not news; it's isto sranje, drugo pakovanje (different
day, same b.s.).
This is not to say that nothing is really happening in Bosnia, but the trends
are much slower and you could probably skip reading the news most of the time
without missing much actual news. Rather than news, there are trends, and the
most important trend this year has to do with Bosnia's international relations:
with the EU and NATO on one hand, and with Russia and China and the other.
Changes in the international realm have clearly been prompted by Russia's
vicious assault on Ukraine, which has forced the EU to focus on its perimeter in
ways that it has been unable to do for at least a decade and a half. There is
relative cohesion and harmony of politics within the Western bloc (EU + US) at
this time, which is not to say that there is absolute harmony, nor that it will
last very long.
There's nothing like having a common enemy to concentrate the mind. The West has
been forced, let's say, back into a Cold War mode wherein there's a clear threat
on the eastern frontier, and it has, for now, taken the side of Ukraine. We'll
see how long that uniform response lasts. EU member Hungary has, notably, been
on the fence, preventing EU sanctions against Russia. Slovenia held a similar
position until May of this year, when its right-wing nationalist prime minister
was ousted.
Nervousness about Russian aggression has caused Western powers to increase their
focus on the Western Balkans, especially on Bosnia, where political leanings are
divided between East and West. Bosniak politicians uniformly support EU
accession and oppose Russia's war on Ukraine. Croat and Serb nationalist
politicians all rhetorically support going to the EU but are, at best, publicly
ambivalent on Russia.
The leaders of both ethnic groups have at least criticized Russia's invasion and
declared in favor of respect for Ukraine's sovereignty. But at the same time,
Croat and Serb leaders
Čović and Dodik, respectively, have maintained ties with Putin. Dodik is
visiting Putin and his foreign secretary Lavrov as I write this, and has
recently announced a favorable deal with Russia for supply of gas to the RS.
Čović's and especially Dodik's leanings have prevented Bosnia-Herzegovina from
participating in Western sanctions against Russia.
The situation is similar with neighboring Serbia. Both Dodik and Serbian
president Vučić are under international pressure to come down off the fence and
stop supporting Russia, but there has been no significant movement in that
direction from either leader.
On the other hand, the RS's
drive for
secession has been officially delayed. In early June the RS National Assemby,
controlled by Dodik's SNSD party, adopted a resolution postponing implementation
of its plan to "transfer competencies" from the state level to the entity. This
plan was outlined back in December 2021, and given a six-month period to
implement. With that period now ending, the RS leadership has stated that it
will postpone implementation of plans such as creating an entity army, tax
agency, and judiciary, in order to "avoid additional complication of the
international political position of the RS in complicated geopolitical
circumstances."
This is an acknowledgment, according to commentator Avdo Avdić, of the fact that
"the Western world no longer looks the same way at pro-Russian politicians
anywhere in the world." (1) Avdić adds that, besides this, Angela Merkel, the
former Chancellor who (according to Avdić) was clearly sympathetic to Russia,
is no longer in a position to decide things in Germany.
Avdić concludes that Russia's "special operation" in Ukraine has been answered
by a Western "special operation in Bosnia," where pro-Russian operators such as
Dodik and Čović have been exposed. Dodik,
notes
Avdić, is under a variety of sanctions, and Čović and some of his cronies are
also under international pressure for their separatism and obstruction.
Avdić considers that the fight for democracy in Bosnia-Herzegovina is being
fought in Ukraine, and he writes optimistically about the outcome, listing ways
that Western attitudes and practices toward Bosnia have changed in the last few
months. We will see if these changes are sustainable.
BiH-Croatia
Having mentioned Serbia's place in the current international ruckus, I'd like
briefly also to mention Croatia. That country's president, Zoran Milanović,
has outdone himself by letting loose a slew of flagrantly racist, nationalist,
and belligerent statements toward Bosnia over the last few months.
The common theme in Milanović's
utterances has been support for Dragan Čović's separatist project. He has
declared that Bosnian Croats
"will
have a third entity," and has described the Bosniak politicians as blocking
electoral reform. That refers to pro-Bosnian resistance to Čović's long-running
attempt to establish an apartheid system of voting. As I've described before,
this is designed to favor the votes of those Croats who will ensure an HDZ
monopoly on power, to the detriment of potential democratic processes. After
more than a half
year of
futile negotiations, time ran out—for now—on that attempt, as Bosniak
negotiators refused to capitulate to the Croat separatists' demands.
It seems that just about anything that would work in favor of Čović's goals is
acceptable to
Milanović.
That includes Russian destabilization of Bosnia-Herzegovina, Serbian support of
Dodik's separatism, and Dodik's obvious long-running alliance with Čović. All of
these trends work against democratic processes in Bosnia, and that part of
Croatia's political management that has not given up its wartime interventionist
goals thus supports Čović's autocratic manipulation above all else.
In this vein,
Milanović
recently called on the "West" to force Bakir Izetbegović, leader of the largest
Bosniak party, to accept Čović's version of electoral reform or, alternatively,
for High Representative Schmidt to decree that kind of reform as law. This,
while simultaneously calling Schmidt an illegal, illegitimate High
Representative, echoing what Dodik and Russian officials have said.
In this vein,
Milanović
stated, "In this situation, the Serbs are our allies;
how is that not clear to anyone?" And when a journalist commented that the
Republika Srpska was borne of genocide, Milanović
responded, "Hello, America was founded through genocide; the majority of states
came about through crimes." (2)
One more statement from Milanović
drives home the fact that he, along with much of the rest of the governing class
of Croatia, support the Bosnian Croat separatists to the detriment of all else
in Bosnia including peace and stability. When Sweden and Finland recently voiced
interest in joining NATO
Milanović,
speaking for Croatia as a NATO member, declared that Croatia would not support
the two countries' membership as long as Čović's version of electoral reform
were not instituted in Bosnia. He made no excuse for attaching these two
unrelated issues.
Elections
For now, as I have mentioned, the drive for the Croat nationalists'
version of electoral reform is definitively stalled, at least until the October
elections. But for much of the spring, it appeared that Bosnian Croat
politicians were going to be able to prevent those elections from taking place.
On May 5, Bosnia's Central Election Commission (CEC) announced the elections for
October 2. Electoral law requires that the CEC receive funding to administer the
elections by two weeks after such announcement, i.e., May 19.
There are two ways for funding to be allocated, and both were blocked by Croat
officials. One is for the money to be allotted through a vote by the Council of
Ministers, and the other is through legislation by Parliament. For the time
being, funds were blocked because the 2022 state budget had not been
passed—nearly five months into the year. The CEC estimated that it would need
12.52 million KM (about 6.5 million euros) to run the elections. Soon after the
CEC's scheduling of the elections, the Council of Ministers discussed funding
them, but this was blocked by the Minister of Finance, Vjekoslav Bevanda, a
crony of
Čović and an
HDZ stalwart.
The funding was not made available by the deadline of May 19, and the CEC was
compelled to interrupt the printing of voter rolls, mailing envelopes, polling
station signs, and various forms. Members of the CEC were working overtime to
examine lists of signatures supporting the candidacy of various politicians.
With over 90 political parties, and 17 additional independent candidates, this
is no small task.
As member of the state-level presidency
Željko Komšić pointed out, the
HDZ has stated regularly that they are in favor of the elections, but their
officials were meanwhile doing everything they could to block them. Minister
Bevanda should have expedited the submission of the 2022 state budget, but
instead, late in May, he submitted a framework budget estimate for the years
2022 to 2024. This then had to be adopted before the 2022 budget, which could
then take another couple of months to pass.
The CEC, at this time, saying "we need the funds yesterday," called attention to
the fact that there were unallocated funds available from leftover reserves from
past years, and that these should be used to finance the elections. Bevanda
responded saying that such an allocation would be against the law, while the OHR
put out a statement to the contrary. Various commentators now said that only the
OHR could save the situation, by decreeing funding. Meanwhile, in late May
Bevanda again thwarted a vote by the Council of Ministers to fund the elections.
A week into June, Bevanda suggested that the CEC take a loan for 9.7 million KM
from the RAK, Bosnia's agency for regulation of the media. This rather senseless
plan, over three million KM short of what was needed, would have left the CEC
unable to fulfill its duties. The CEC needed to purchase 120 tons of paper, and
print millions of ballots. A day after Bevanda's suggestion, High Representative
Schmidt, using his Bonn powers, decreed that the state shall allocate the full
12.52 million KM for the elections. This superseded Bevanda's suggestion and all
his blocking maneuvers, settling the problem once and for all.
Schmidt's decree also established a mechanism to prevent such financial blockage
in the future. This was the second time Schmidt used the Bonn powers (having
earlier nullified a move by the RS to transfer state-owned property to the
entity). This, after most international officials had repeatedly declared that
the elections must take place. Schmidt commented that he could simply not
believe that the holding of the elections was under any question whatsoever.
This time, there was less shock and surprise at Schmidt's move, but Croat and
Serb separatists reacted with the usual posturing. Dodik stated that
"Bosnia-Herzegovina does not exist as a sovereign state; it is a
failure...Schmidt was not formally appointed [as High Representative], he
doesn't have Bonn powers and he cannot intervene in Bosnia."
In spite of Dodik's declaration, the elections are now cleared to take place—but
look for post-October obstruction from the Croat separatists.
Prijedor
May 31 was "White Armband Day," the anniversary of the time at the beginning of
the war, in 1992, when the newly dominant Serb separatist leaders of Prijedor
municipality announced, on the radio, that all "non-Serbs" must post white
sheets in their windows and wear white armbands when leaving their homes—as a
"demonstration of loyalty" to the new regime. The radio announcement went like
this: "Citizens of Serb nationality, join your army and police in pursuit of
extremists. Other citizens, of Muslim [sic] and Croat nationality, must hang
white flags on their houses and apartments, and wear white bands on their arms.
Otherwise, they will suffer serious consequences."
This demand by the separatist authorities reflected carnage that was already
underway. Croats, Bosniaks, and "Others" who constituted over half of the
municipality's population were nearly entirely driven out in the next couple of
months, thousands of them suffering internment in local concentration camps, and
over 3,000 killed or disappeared.
Activists in Prijedor and around the world have commemorated the White Armbands
announcement for over ten years, with annual attempts to stage a march or rally
in Prijedor town. This has met with varying degrees of repression over the
years. This year, local authorities—members of Dodik's SNSD party—tried a new
approach: scheduling a variety of events on the same day, thus arranging a
prefabricated scheduling "conflict." One event was set to mark "World Tobacco
Day," starting first thing in the morning. Then in mid-morning a youth group
organized a public celebration of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, whose
autocratic ways are in harmony with those of Milorad Dodik. A concurrent theme
was the celebration of Serbian president Vučić's
five years in office.
Apparently this latter event was very sparsely attended, but that did not stop
local authorities from curtailing the next scheduled event, the one meant to
commemorate the white armband radio announcement and all the evils associated
with the onset of Serb extremist rule. The Prijedor police allowed the gathering
to take place, but prohibited a planned march, saying that it could create a
"security risk." In spite of this, several hundred supporters wearing white
armbands gathered for an hour of peaceful demonstration.
In contrast to this event, on the day before, Serb authorities had allowed a
march through the city commemorating the 80th anniversary of Prijedor's
liberation from Nazi forces, and simultaneously commemorating the "Day of
defense" of Prijedor in 1992.
In recent years the focus of Prijedor returnee activism has largely been the
call for the creation of a memorial to the 102 children who were killed in the
municipality during the 1990s war. Activists have been advocating for this
memorial for over a decade. With the departure of long-time mayor Marko
Pavić, a wartime nationalist figure and a staunch obstructionist, the next mayor
and the city council allowed an opening to discussion of the project. However,
two mayors later, the memorial has been obstructed yet again, and is further
from realization than before.
There have been countering proposals that make it seem that there could be an
equitable approach to the memorialization of the children who were killed, but
this is illusory. Both proposals afloat would serve, in fact, to erase the
memory of those children. One proposal is to construct a monument that would
list the names of all of the children killed not only in the 1990s war (all
Bosniaks), but also all of those killed in World War II, and perhaps even in the
previous World War. Such a monument would bury the names of those killed in the
1990s among hundreds of other names—if the research required were ever completed
enough to allow the project to get off the ground. The other proposal calls for
a monument to the children, with no names. This would be another manner of
enforced forgetting of history.
May 9th, Victory Day
Historically May 9th has been the day that Eastern European countries,
especially those of the Soviet bloc, have celebrated the end of World War II,
the great anti-fascist victory. As I've written before, in recent years both in
Bosnia-Herzegovina and in Russia, "anti-fascism" has been co-opted by arguably
fascist leaders and movements. Thus in Serbia the memory of the WWII Chetnik
leader Draža
Mihailović has been elevated to the same level as that of the Partisans. Mladić
and Karadžić have been glorified as fighters for the freedom of the Serb people.
Such cooptation has carried on and been even more amplified this
year, in the time of Russia's onslaught against "Nazism" in Ukraine. So the
ostentatious commemoration of May 9th in pro-Russian circles has taken on an
even more sinister connotation.
In Banja Luka, capital of the Serb-controlled entity, a march was held
re-enacting the "March of the Immortal Regiment," a relatively new post-Soviet,
Russian commemoration of Soviet participants in the war. The event in Banja Luka
was notable for its VIP attendees: Dodik; the RS president and prime minister;
Russian Ambassador to Bosnia Igor Kalabuhov; and the Russian biker club (said to
be "Putin's favorite"), Noćni vukovi (the Night Wolves). Kalabuhov praised the
"day of solidarity between the Russian and Serb peoples and all anti-fascists of
Bosnia-Herzegovina."
Remembering the losses and gains of WWII, Kalabuhov also stated, "We arrived
there where we had to arrive: in Berlin...Today's date is a day of great sadness
because of the loss of 27 million Soviet lives, but it is also a day of warning,
as it is visible that neo-Nazism has raised its head. We will realize all of our
goals and arrive there where we must come," drawing a clear parallel between
Berlin then, and Kyiv now.
Some days after the commemoration, Dodik expressed related, recognizably fascist
thoughts in a letter to his autocratic friend Viktor Orban, prime minister of
Hungary. He wrote, "I agree with you that a Europe in which immigration is
allowed leads to the destruction of its biological future founded on Christian
values and principles. Hungary has recognized that the true way to biological
renewal of the nation is the increase in its own birth rate, and not the
importation of people from other areas, from other cultures, civilizations, and
non-Christian faiths. The Republika Srpska recognizes these values as its own
and within the boundaries of its own possibilities."
Fascism is not dead in Europe.
Meanwhile, the anti-fascist holiday was commemorated in Sarajevo as well—more in
the traditional spirt of the day. There, local officials laid flowers at the
Viječna vatra—the Eternal Flame commemorating the anti-Nazi victory in
Yugoslavia. The prime minister of Sarajevo Canton spoke:
"It is unbelievable that we have again come to a situation where we must say
'Death to Fascism!' We must struggle against fascism in Sarajevo. Historically,
Sarajevo has stood on the right side, but fascism does not sleep, and the
struggle does not end. Now is the time to renew our anti-fascist foundations,
because if we do not nurture them, all will be destroyed."
1. Avdo
Avdić, "Slava
Ukrajini! - Rusi su došli 'tek' do Sjeverodonjecka..."
(Glory to Ukraine! – The Russians have "only" gotten to Severodonetsk),
Oslobodjenje, June 9, 2022
2. "Milanović
javno "otkrio karte" / Hrvati će ići u treći entitet, Srbi su nam saveznici - Pa
šta ako je RS nastao na zločinu?"
(Milanović publicly showed his cards; Croats will get a third entity, Serbs are
our allies, so what if the RS came about through crimes?). Oslobodjenje, May 5,
2022.
To respond to this blog,
click here to e-mail me.